“Just Be Yourself”
“Circumcised or Intact?!” Screw Her Preference!
Women: Career or Romance, Choose Your God
Dealing with a Breakup: 10 Tips for Men
29 Reasons Nightclubs Suck
Ladder Theory: Revised and Revisited
‘Understanding Women:’ A Book I’d Like to Destroy
Why Women Ruin Their Husband’s Friendships
Canada’s Marriage Fraud Crackdown
Mrs. Control Freak and Mr. Spineless Eat Out
Trunk’s Hypocritical, “Immature and Selfish” Take on Divorce
Jail for Facebook Rant about “Evil” Ex-Wife
Cheating Military Wife Wants it All
Alpha Redux?


32
David Foster says:
March 31, 2015 at 8:47 pm
Richard Aubrey….agreed, “the map is not the territory,” and it’s important to look at the specific individual in whatever case, not just some categorization of him/her. However, I think the categorization schemes are extremely valuable in getting people to understand just how wide the range of personality types is, and that the person sitting across from you may have an internal world quite different from your own.

33
Richard Aubrey says:
March 31, 2015 at 10:26 pm
David Foster.
Not unless they picked that seat at random and sat down without asking permission.
I was referring to a voluntary association, you and the other person.
Sufficiently different internal landscapes manifest themselves externally. Just as certain people’s body odor is a function of metabolism, diet, hormones, the actions of a mesomorph–speaking personality-wise–would look different from those of an ectomorph. You would be more likely to be sitting with one than random, and less likely to be sitting with the other, other than random. Some wouldn’t want to sit with you and others you wouldn’t want to sit with. So the sitter-across-the-table is from a cohort excluding substantial numbers of different personality types.

---